The Study of Parameters of Quarry Faces in Muruntau and Myutenbai Open Pits in Case of Applying Major Blasts


https://doi.org/10.17073/2500-0632-2019-1-4-15

Full Text:


Abstract

The paper presents process layouts for excavation of zones near pit envelope based on the analysis of findings of the ore loss study in case of open-pit mining, as well as the results of field measurements in the quarry faces in Muruntau and Myutenbai open pits. In the course of the field measurements, parameters of the quarry faces at Muruntau and Myutenbai open pits were determined under the following working conditions of an excavator: at full bench with shotpile height of 19–21 m; at full bench with shotpile height of 12–14 m at excavation of the “blast cap”; at heading face and taking ramp material. In all the above-listed quarry faces, the slope angles and the ore mass shotpile height when excavating were measured. Besides, the used excavator type (dragline or hydraulic) was taken into account. For each face, 2–3 measurements were performed, and the average slope angle at the ore mass excavation was determined for each type of excavator. At the next stage of the field measurements, the bench height in the rock mass and the shotpile parameters were measured before and after blasting operations under the following arrangements for preparing the rock mass for excavation: a) under normal conditions, when the ore mass blasting is performed for the selected face or relieving wall of the required thickness; b) in compression with a “blast cap” formation; c) in the marginal parts of the bench. Based on the results of the actual bench height and the blasted rock shotpile parameter field measurements, the following conclusions were drawn: a) the actual slope angles of the quarry faces were 49° when excavating the “blast cap” using dragline excavators, and 53° when excavating the ore mass at full bench regardless of the excavator type used; the slope angles of 49° for the dragline excavator and 53° for the hydraulic excavators were taken for further calculations; b) the width of the marginal (near-envelope) zone, where losses and dilution of balance ore are generated, increased from 7 to 13.0 m (at 49°) and from 7 to 11.3 m (at 53°); as a result, the areas of loss and dilution triangles have increased; c) when blasting in compression conditions, in the upper part of the shotpile, intense mixing of the involved rock and all ore grades occurs, therefore, when excavating the “blast cap”, bulk ore mass mining is only possible. The lower part of the blasted bench preserves the geological structure of the rock mass to a greater degree and can be selectively excavated with separation of the ore mass by grade; d) when blasting the rock mass, to maintain the required pulse direction and the blasting sequence, barren boreholes are included in the breaking outline, which increase the balance ore dilution, and structural dilution arises, which should be taken into account when drawing up the "Methods for determining, limitation and accounting for ore losses and dilution in the course of the Muruntau and Myutenbai (the fifth stage) open-pit mining"; e) when compiling the "Methods ...", the option of dividing a bench of 15 m high into two sub-benches of 7.5 m should be considered.

About the Authors

B. R. Raimzhanov
State Unitary Enterprise "O’zGEORANGMETLITI".
Uzbekistan
Tashkent.


A. R. Khasanov
State Unitary Enterprise "O’zGEORANGMETLITI".
Uzbekistan
Tashkent.


R. R. Vakhitov
State Unitary Enterprise "O’zGEORANGMETLITI".
Uzbekistan
Tashkent.


References

1. Life-of-Mine plans for Muruntau and Myutenbai deposits for 2018; TsRU, GP NGMK, 2018. (in Russ.)

2. Feasibility study (TEO) "Muruntau pit mining (V stage)". (in Russ.)

3. Geological level plans presenting actual outlines of ore bodies (Characteristic grade plans for quarry faces) of Muruntau and Myutenbai open pits. (in Russ.)

4. Factual materials of Muruntau mine provided on request: Parameters of quarry faces. Drilling projects for Muruntau and Myutenbai deposits. Typical drilling-and-blasting projects for the open pits. (in Russ.)

5. Temporary instruction on geological support of open-pit mining at Muruntau and Mutenbai gold deposits: Zarafshan, 2014. (in Russ.)

6. Ruling technical document "Operational standards and instructions for accounting losses, dilution of ore in conditions of open-pit mining at Muruntau and Kokpatas deposits of Navoi MMC": Moscow-Navoi, 1994. (in Russ.)

7. Sectoral instruction for calculation, accounting for, rate setting, and planning of ore losses and dilution at underground and open-pit mining of radioactive, rare, and precious metals (RD 8-19-92): All-Russian FEED and R&D establishment for Industrial Technology "VNIPIpromtekhnologii", Moscow, 1993. (in Russ.)

8. Typical guidelines for rate setting, assessing the economic consequences, and estimation and accounting for mining losses of minerals, approved by the USSR State Technical Inspection on March 28, 1972: Collection of guidances on subsoil protection, Moscow, Nedra Press, 1973. (in Russ.)

9. Unified safety rules for mining ores, nonmetallics, and placer accumulations: Tashkent, 1996. (in Russ.)

10. Mining rules for open pits, placers and underground mines for nonferrous, rare, and precious metals: Moscow, Nedra Press, 1981. (in Russ.)

11. Sinclair A., Blackwell G. Applied Mineral Inventory Estimation, Cambridge University Press, 2002.

12. Canadian Securities Administrators, National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (NI 43-101), 2012.

13. Gerald D. Crawford Pincock Allen and Holt, Pincock perspectives, Dilution and ore Recovery, issue NO. 60, 2004.

14. Parker H. M. Reconciliation principles for the mining industry .Published by Maney on behalf of the In¬stitute of Materials, Minerals and Metallurgy and the AusIMM, maneypublishing.com, 2012.

15. Pakalnis R., Poulin, R. and Hadjieorgiou J. Quantifying the Cost of Dilution in Underground Mines, SME Annual Metallurgy and Exploration, Denver, 1995.

16. Scoble M. J., and Moss A. Dilution in underground bulk mining: implications for production manage¬ment; in Whateley, M. K. G., and P. K., 1994.

17. Beck D. A. Stress influences on rockmass damage and stope stability at GF mine-calibrated model crite¬ria. Consultant report for Xstrata Zinc, George Fisher mine, 2003.

18. Barton N., Lien R., Lunde J. Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech. 6(4):189-236, 1974.

19. Brady T. M., Pakalnis R., Clark L. Design in weak rock masses: Nevada underground mining operations. SME preprint 05-43. Littleton, CO: Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc., 2005.

20. Capes G. W., Grant D. R., Neindorf L. B. George Fisher: sustainable mine design. Paper presented at the Second International Seminar on Strategic Versus Tactical Approaches in Mining (Perth, Australia), 2006.

21. Capes G. W., Milne D. M., Grant D. R. Stope hangingwall design approaches at the Xstrata Zinc, George Fisher mine, North Queensland, Australia. In: Chen G, Huang S, Zhou W, Tinucci J, eds. Proceedings of the 40th U.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium (Anchorage, AK, June 25-29, 2005). Alexandria, VA: American Rock Mechan¬ics Association, 2005.

22. Clark L., Pakalnis R. An empirical design approach for estimating unplanned dilution from open stope hangingwalls and footwalls. Presented at the 99th Canadian Institute of Mining Annual Conference (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada), 1997. 

23. Deere D. U. Technical description of rock cores for engineer-purposes. Rock Mech. Eng.Geol. 1(1), 1964.

24. Forrestal P. J. Mount Isa and Hilton silver-lead- zinc deposits. In: Hughes FE, ed. Geology of the mineral deposits of Australia and Papua New Guinea. AusIMM Monogr 14:927-934, 1990.

25. Grenfell K., Hay don M. Challenges in modelling large complex orebodies at the George Fisher north mine. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Mining Geology Conference (Darwin, Northern Territory, Austral¬ia, August 21-23, 2006), 2006.

26. Hadjigeorgiou J. Memorandum of March 11, 1999, from John Hadjigeorgiou, Laval University, Quebec, Canada: a discussion document on geotechnical rock mass characterisation for Mount Isa, 1999.

27. Miller F., Jacobs D., Potvin Y. Laser measurement of open stope dilution. CIM Bull 85 :Jul-Aug., 1992.

28. Potvin Y. Empirical open-stope design in Canada [Dissertation]. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: University of British Columbia, 1988.

29. Yunliang M., Fuying G. and Zhanwu M. Strengthening the Technical Cooperation to Reduce Loss and Dilution Rates, Express Information of Mining Industry, Vol. 17, pp. 34-39., 2000.

30. Chen Y. W. The Calculation and Experience of the Mining Total Loss and Impoverishing Index, Gold Science and Technology, Vol. 6, pp. 21-30, 2002.

31. Wang X. X., Yu H. Optimise Ore Dilute and Loss Rate, Enhance Mine Economic Effectiveness, Mineral Resources and Geology, Vol. 3, pp. 51-58, 2000.


Supplementary files

For citation: Raimzhanov B.R., Khasanov A.R., Vakhitov R.R. The Study of Parameters of Quarry Faces in Muruntau and Myutenbai Open Pits in Case of Applying Major Blasts. Gornye nauki i tekhnologii = Mining Science and Technology (Russia). 2019;4(1):4-15. https://doi.org/10.17073/2500-0632-2019-1-4-15

Views: 254

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2500-0632 (Online)