On the concept of in-situ metal leaching

The information on history of in-situ metal leaching method (ISL) was given. The role of Russian scientists and research organizations in research into ISL processes was shown. Examples of ISL application at the mines of the USSR, the CIS and nonCIS countries with the implementation features were given. The main disadvantages of ISL were formulated: low rate of metal production and difficulty in monitoring the completeness of metal recovery into pregnant solution. It was noted that underground leaching of even well-crushed ores lasts for many years. This, under otherwise equal conditions, decreases attractiveness of ISL in comparison with traditional methods of metal mining. Well-known and new promising methods of the leaching process intensification for increasing the rate of metal extraction into solution were described. As illustrated by the North Caucasian deposits of the Sadon group, the expediency of ISL use for extracting the residual reserves, which would not be extracted by the traditional methods, was shown. The role of Professor I.A. Ostroushko in development and implementation of methods for extracting metals remained in the mined-out space of mines, in particular, by extracting metals from the Sadon deposits wastewater. Information on the current state of ISL application was given. The conclusion was made about insufficient use of this promising method in mining in some regions. For the first time, the details of the ISL general concept were clarified: the feasibility of ISL use not only in favorable conditions, but also at non-continuous geology and mineralization; ISL applicability for not only substandard ores (non-extractable by traditional mining methods), but also for balance reserves; ISL (block leaching) was proposed as an alternative to traditional mining methods in specific conditions, for example, at the North Caucasian complex ore deposits.

metal mining, in-situ leaching, pregnant solution, ore, process intensification, lost reserves

1. Razorenov Yu. I., Golik V. I., Kulikov M. M. Economics and management of mining industry: textbook. Manual for graduate students with specialization in geology and mining. Novocherkassk; 2010. (In Russ.)

2. Dmitrak Yu. V., Kamnev E. N. JSC “Leading Design-and-Survey and Scientific Research Institute of Industrial Technology” – 65 years of development. Gornyy zhurnal. 2016;3:6-12. (In Russ.)

3. Ghorbani Y., Franzidis J.-P., Petersen J. Heap Leaching Technology – Current State, Innovations, and Future Directions: A review. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. 2016;37(2):73-119

4. Jarvie-Eggart M. E. Responsible Mining: Case Studies in Managing Social & Environmental Risks in the Developed World. Englewood, Colorado: Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration; 2015. 804 р.

5. Dmitrak Yu. V., Tsidaev B. S., Dzaparov V. Kh., Kharebov G. Kh. Mineral resource base of nonferrous metallurgy in Russia. Vektor GeoNauk. 2019;2(1):9–18. (In Russ.)

6. Golik V. I., Bui X. N., Maslennikov S. A., Anischenko V. I. Using Properties of Discrete Rocks to Optimize Backfiling. Gornye nauki i tekhnologii = Mining Science and Technology (Russia). 2019;4(3):213-219. DOI: 10.17073/2500-0632-2019-3-213-219 (In Russ.)

7. Gavrishev S. E., Burmistrov K. V., Osintsev N. A. The concept of sustainable functioning and development of mining systems in transition periods. News of the Tula state university. Sciences of Earth. 2019;(3):145-160. (In Russ.)

8. Golik V. I., Razorenov Yu. I., Stradanchenko S. G., Khasheva Z. M. Principles and economic performance of combining ore mining methods. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University, Geo Assets Engineering. 2015;326(7):6-14. (In Russ.)

9. Golik V. I., Doolin A. N., Komissarova M. A., Doolin R. A. Evaluating the effectiveness of utilization of mining waste. International Business Management. 2015;9(6):1119-1123.

10. Dzaparov VKh. A threat to life safety in the North Ossetia-Alania region. Vestnik of Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University. 2009;3(27):75-76. (In Russ.)

11. Lyashenko V. I. Environmental protection technologies for development of mineral deposits of complicated structure. Mine surveying bulletin. 2015;(1):10-15. (In Russ.)

12. Oxley A., Smith M. E., Caceres O. Why heap leach nickel laterites? Minerals Engeneering. 2016;88:53-60

13. Sinclair L., Thompson J. In situ leaching of copper: Challenges and future pro spects. Hydrometallurgy. 2015;157:306-324

14. Lyashenko V. I., Khomenko O. E., Golik V. I. Friendly and Resource-Saving Methods of Underground Ore Mining in Disturbed Rock Masses. 2020;5(2):104-118. DOI: 10.17073/2500-0632-2020-2-104-118 (In Russ.)

15. Melnikov I. T., Gavrishev S. E., Mikhailov A. G., Pytalev I. A., Shevtsov N. S., Vasiliev K. P. A new approach for assessing performance of mining and processing complexes. Russian Mining Industry. 2012;5(105):60-66. (In Russ.)

16. Razorenov Yu. I., Belodedov A. A., Shmalenyuk S. A. Determination of losses and dilution in the course of development of mineral deposits. Mining Information and Analytical Bulletin. 2009;(9):47-50. (In Russ.)

17. Dmitrak Yu. V., Verzhansky A. P. Trends in the use of equipment for fine grinding of rocks. Mining Information and Analytical Bulletin. 2000;(6):184-188. (In Russ.)

18. Komashchenko V. I. Application of modern methods of initiation and designs of blasthole charges to improve the quality of rock mass crushing. Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories. 2015;2(24):12-17. (In Russ.)

19. Lyashenko V. I., Stus’ V. P. Environmental protection in the zone affected by uranium production. Bezopasnost' zhiznedeyatel'nosti 2015;3:37-44. (In Russ.)

20. Kachurin N. M., Stas G. V., Korchagina T. V., Zmeev M. V. Geotechnical and aero-gasdynamic consequences of undermining of mining leases of Eastern Donbass collieries. News of the Tula state university. Sciences of Earth. 2017;1:170-182. (In Russ.)