Evaluation of the efficiency and environmental impact (on subsoil and groundwater) of underground block leaching (UBL) of metals from ores
https://doi.org/10.17073/2500-0632-2022-1-5-17
Abstract
One of the most problematic aspects of underground block leaching (UBL) of metals from ores is the possibility of pollution of water and air in the affected zone. Therefore, proving the possibility of mitigating environmental impact of metal leaching from ores by managing production processes with the implementation of nature- and resource-saving technologies is an important objective. The purpose of this study is to justify underground development effectiveness of ore deposits by traditional and integrated methods with leaching of metals from substandard and off-balance ores. This will allow the raw material base for extraction of metals from off-balance ores to be expanded and the environmental impact on subsoil and groundwater (hydrogeological systems) to be mitigated. A distinctive feature of a UBL (underground site for leaching of metals from shrunk ores) is that leaching solutions are supplied from sorption column placed in mining workings of the leaching level in the immediate vicinity of the extracting block. The pregnant solutions in the form of resin are discharged from the sorption column, placed in the leaching level mine workings, then winded in mine cars and further supplied to hydrometallurgical plant in tanks. A still rare attempt to justify the efficiency and environmental safety of underground metal leaching (UBL) from off-balance and substandard rock ores in installations mounted in mine workings, on the basis of monitoring and evaluation of subsoil and groundwater conditions was investigated. The average value of uranium concentration by level was established: 210 m – 3.6 mg/L; 225 m – 3.58 mg/L; 280 m – 0.91 mg/L. At the same time no contamination of underground mine waters was detected. Levels of sulfuric acid aerosols and radon decomposition products did not exceed the maximum allowable concentration (MAC) values. It is recommended that the hydrogeological environment be protected through silting the bottom of the stope for collection of pregnant solutions with clay mud and construct semi-active water-permeable chemically active barriers. The mentioned BIL process was implemented during the development of pilot block 5-86 and recommended for blocks 5-84-86 and 5-88-90 of Michurinskoye deposit of SE VostGOK, Ukraine, as well as during for development of ore deposits in Russia, Kazakhstan, and other developed mining countries.
Keywords
ore deposits,
underground block leaching (UBL),
installations,
mine workings,
monitoring,
hydrogeological systems and environment,
groundwater,
performance
Supporting agencies: The authors are grateful to Y. N. Tarkhin, N.A. Khudoshina, L.A. Lyashenko, A. H. Dudchenk, A.A. Tkachenko (SE “UkrNIPIpromtekhnologii”), V. N. Pukhalsky, P. M. Kucha, A.V. Kopanev, V.V. Sinchuk, V.A. Merkulov (SE “Vostochny GOK”), and other specialists of these enterprises for assistance in the implementation of the obtained scientific and practical findings of the research.
About the Authors
V. I. Lyashenko
Ukrainian Research and Design and Survey Institute of Industrial Technology
Ukraine
Ukraine
Vasiliy I. Lyashenko – Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Senior Research Fellow
Scopus ID 8915855500
Yellow Waters
V. I. Golik
North Caucasus Mining and Metallurgical Institute (GTU); Moscow Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir I. Golik – Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor of the Mining Department, North Caucasian Mining and Metallurgical Institute
Scopus ID 6602135324
Vladikavkaz
R. V. Klyuev
Moscow Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Roman V. Klyuev – Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor of the Department of the Technique of Low Temperature name P. L. Kapitza
Scopus ID 57194206632
Moscow
References
1. Mosinets V. N., Lobanov D. P., Tedeev M. N. et al. Construction and operation of ISL mines. Monograph. Under the general editorship of Mosinets V. N. Мoscow: Nedra Publ.; 1987. 304 p. (In Russ.)
2. Chernov A. P. (ed.) Mining and processing of uranium ores in Ukraine. Kyiv: Adef-Ukraine Publ.; 2001. 238 p. (In Russ.)
3. Lyashenko V. I., Golik V. I., Kozyrev E. N. Integrated mining methods with underground leaching. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2008;(12):37–40 (In Russ.)
4. Dzaparov V. Kh. Life threat of RSO-Alaniya reion. Vestnik of Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University. 2009;(3):75–76. (In Russ.). URL: http://vestnik.magtu.ru/content/%D0%92%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%20%D0%9C%D0%93%D0%A2%D0%A3%20%D0%B7%D0%B0%202009%20%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4,%20%D0%9D%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%203.pdf
5. Ahrens V. Zh., Babichev N. I., Bashkatov A. D. et al. In situ leaching. 2nd ed. Мoscow: Gornaya Kniga Publ.; 2011. 295 p. (In Russ.)
6. Lyashenko V. I., Kisly P. A., Djatchin V. Z. Radiometrical preconcentration of uranium ores. Obogashchenie Rud. 2015;(1):3–9 (In Russ.)
7. Lyashenko V. I., Khomenko O. E., Golik V. I. Friendly and resource-saving methods of underground ore mining in disturbed rock masses. Mining Science and Technology (Russia). 2020;5(2):104–118. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/2500-0632-2020-2-104-118
8. Ghorbani Y., Franzidis J.-P., Petersen J. Heap leaching technology – current state, innovations, and future directions: a review. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. 2016;37(2):73–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/08827508.2015.1115990
9. Oxley A., Smith M.E., Caceres O. Why heap leach nickel laterites. Minerals Engeneering. 2016;88:53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2015.09.018
10. Vrancken C., Longhurst P. J., Wagland S. T. Critical review of real-time methods for solid waste characterisation: Informing material recovery and fuel production. Waste Management. 2017;61:40–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.019
11. Li J., Li D., Xu Z., Liao C., Liu Y., Zhong B. Selective leaching of valuable metals from laterite nickel ore with ammonium chloridehydrochloric acid solution. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;179:24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.085
12. Gabaraev O. Z., Dmitrak Yu.V., Drebenshtedt K., Savelkov V. I. Regularities of interaction of destroyed geo-materials and ore-bearing massif in the processing of processed deposited ore. Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories. 2017;9(4):406–413. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21177/1998-4502-2017-9-4-406-413
13. Komashchenko V. I. Environmental-economical expediency of utilizing mining-industrial wastes for their converting. Izvestija Tulskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Nauki o Zemle. 2015;(4):23–30. (In Russ.). URL: https://tidings.tsu.tula.ru/tidings/pdf/web/file/tsu_izv_earth_science_2015_04.pdf
14. Burdzieva O. G., Zaalishvili V. B., Beriev O. G., Kanukov A. S., Maysuradze M.V. Mining impact on environment on the North Ossetian territory. International Journal of GEOMATE. 2016;10(1):1693–1697. URL: https://geomatejournal.com/geomate/article/view/2012/1888
15. Karamushka V. P., Kamnev E. N., Kuzin R. Z. Reclamation of uranium ore mining and processing facilities. Мoscow: Gornaya Kniga Publishing House; 2014. 183 p. (In Russ.)
16. Kachurin N., Kоmashchenko V., Morkun V. Environmental monitoring atmosphere of mining territories. Metallurgical and Mining Industry. 2015;(6):595–597. URL: https://www.metaljournal.com.ua/assets/Journal/MMI-6/083-Nikolai-Kachurin.pdf
17. Svyatetsky V. S., Solodov I. N. Technological advancement strategy of uranium mining industry in Russia. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2015;(7):68–77. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2015.07.10
18. Kaplunov D. R., Yukov V.A., Lavenkov V. S. The underground copper block and boreholes leaching methods comparison. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. 2017;(3):7–14. URL: https://giab-online.ru/files/Data/2017/3/7_14_3_2017.pdf
19. Morozov A.A., Yakovlev M.V. Off-balance uranium ores formed at development of the Streltsovsky ore field involvement in processing. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. 2016;(12):174–181. (In Russ.). URL: https://giab-online.ru/files/Data/2016/12/174_181_12_2016.pdf
20. Rylnikova M.V., Radchenko D. N. Methodological aspects of designing a system of mineral flow management in the full cycle of integrated development of ore deposits. Ratsionalnoe Osvoenie Nedr. 2016;(3):36–41 (In Russ.)
21. Chen T., Lei C., Yan B., Xiao X. Metal recovery from the copper sulfide tailing with leaching and fractional precipitation technology. Hydrometallurgy. 2014;147–148:178–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.05.018
22. Ghorbani Y., Franzidis J.-P., Petersen J. Heap leaching technology – current state, innovations, and future directions: a review. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. 2016;37(2):73–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/08827508.2015.1115990
23. Kopbaeva M. P., Panova E. N., Prinzin N.A., Karmanov E. M. Optimization of uranium peroxide precipitation. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2016;(5):90–94. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17580/gzh.2016.05.13
24. Solodov I. N., Kamnev E. N. (eds). Uranium geotechnology (Russian experience). Мoscow: KDU Publ.; 2017. 576 p. (In Russ.)
25. Svyatetskiy V. S., Polonyankina S.V., Ermakov A. G. Uranium-mining industry of Russia: the state and prospects of development. Razvedka i Okhrana Nedr. 2017;(11):22–26. (In Russ.)
26. Mashkovtsev G.A., Miguta A. K., Shchetochkin V. N. Uranium resource base. Problems of exploration and development. Mineral Recourses of Russia. Economics and Management. 2017;(3):67–78. (In Russ.)
27. Balikhin A.V. Uranium mineral-resources: the current state and perspectives for development. Review. Kompleksnoe Ispol’zovanie Mineral’nogo Syr’a. 2019;(1):36–50. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31643/2019/6445.05
28. Sinclair L., Thompson J. In situ leaching of copper: Challenges and future prospects. Hydrometallurgy. 2015;157:306–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2015.08.022
29. Aben E., Markenbayev Zh., Khairullaev N., et al. Study of change in the leaching solution activity after treatment with a cavitator. Mining of Mineral Deposits. 2019;13(4):114–120. https://doi.org/10.33271/mining13.04.114
30. Malanchuk Z., Korniienko V., Malanchuk Ye., et al. Modeling the formation of high metal concentration zones in man-made deposits. Mining of Mineral Deposits. 2018;12(2):76–84. https://doi.org/10.15407/mining12.02.076
31. Stupnik M., Kalinichenko O., Kalinichenko V., et al. Choice and substantiation of stable crown shapes in deep-level iron ore mining. Mining of Mineral Deposits. 2018;12(4):56–62. https://doi.org/10.15407/mining12.04.056
32. Ovseychuk V. A., Zozulia A. M. Improvement of in-situ leaching: a case-study of the Streltsovo ore field. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. 2021;(3–1):26–33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25018/0236_1493_2021_31_0_26
33. Kovalchuk I., Tobilko V., Kholodko Yu., Zahorodniuk N., Kornilovych B. Purification of mineralized waters from U(VI) compounds using bentonite/iron oxide composites. Technology Audit and Production Reserves. 2020;3(3):12–18. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.205146
34. Antoninova N. Yu., Sobenin A.V., Shubina L.A. Assessment of usability of industrial waste in construction of geochemical barriers. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. 2020;(12):78–88. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25018/0236-1493-2020-12-0-78-88
35. Kamnev E. N., Karamushka V. P., Seleznev A.V., et al. Ecology of uranium mine closure: problems and solutions (in terms of Russia, CIS Countries and Germany). Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. 2020;(5):26–39. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25018/0236-1493-2020-5-0-26-39
36. Podrezov D. R. Issues of improving control and increasing efficiency of production blocks at an ISL uranium mine. Mining Science and Technology (Russia). 2020;5(2):131–153. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17073/2500-0632-2020-2-131-153
Review
For citations:
Lyashenko V.I., Golik V.I., Klyuev R.V. Evaluation of the efficiency and environmental impact (on subsoil and groundwater) of underground block leaching (UBL) of metals from ores. Mining Science and Technology (Russia). 2022;7(1):5-17. https://doi.org/10.17073/2500-0632-2022-1-5-17
Views:
785
Email this article 