Physical simulation aspects of structural changes in rock samples under thermobaric conditions at great depths

When designing the parameters for the development of oil and gas field at significant depths, crucial to comprehend how certain factors affect the behavior of reservoir rocks and host rocks. These factors include the high level of rock stress, the ambient temperature field, and the hydro- and gas-dynamic processes within the mass. The impact of one or a combination of these factors can result in alterations to the construction, structure, composition, and properties of the rock mass and, ultimately leading to a mismatch between the design solutions and the actual conditions.

The purpose of the research is to establish a methodology for conducting laboratory studies that investigate the impact of the mode of occurrence of oil and gas field reservoirs at great depths on the properties of rock samples.

The research objectives encompass a theoretical analysis and the identification of the principal factors influencing rock behavior and changes in internal structure. Additionally, the objectives include developing laboratory research methods that comprehensively simulate these factors and conducting trial experiments to assess their effects.

As part of the project, tests were conducted on sandstone samples collected from depth ranging from 3.5 to 4 km within the hydrocarbon field. These studies were performed while simulating thermobaric reservoir conditions, which include temperature, rock pressure, and reservoir pressure.

The results of these experiments, aimed at examining the behavior of rock samples as closely as possible to their natural reservoir occurrence at depth of 3.5–4 km, are presented. It has been observed that rock samples of the same lithology, collected from nearly identical depths, can exhibit significant differences in deformation characteristics, both in the pre- and off-limit regions of loading. The findings from these studies provide the initial data for the development and refinement of geomechanical model behavior for materials that take into account not only fracture strength criteria but also dilatancy processes at various stages of rock deformation. Increasing lateral pressure within the range of 0 to to 55 MPa causes relatively minor change in ultrasonic vibration velocities, typically ranging from 1 to 10%. This makes it challenging to determine the necessity of utilizing these results for indirectly assessing changes in rock properties within the mass. Nevertheless, within the context of geophysical studies, considering variations in velocity values enhances the quality of result interpretation, especially given the substantial geometric dimensions of the rock masses under investigation.

Research into the acoustic emissions of rocks in a complex stressed state enables the monitoring of spatial micro- and macrofracturing processes throughout the entire loading phase of samples. This provides a more comprehensive understanding of changes in their internal structure. The article delves into the factors that impact structural changes in oil and gas field rocks, particularly as their development extends to greater depths. The study outlines methodological approaches that facilitate the investigation of physical and mechanical properties of rock samples, while accurately modeling complex thermobaric conditions. Additionally, the it describes the technical specifications of the testing equipment, ensuring the closest possible replication of the actual conditions of reservoir rock occurrences. Lastly, the study reveals key features related to the deformation and fracture of rock samples during testing under lateral pressures of 55 MPa and pore pressures of 30 MPa, along with the creation of temperature fields up to 100 °C.

1. Nguyen V. T., Rogachev M. K., Aleksandrov A. N. A new approach to improving efficiency of gas-lift wells in the conditions of the formation of organic wax deposits in the Dragon field. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology. 2020;(10):3663–3672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-020-00976-4

2. Petrakov D., Kupavykh K., Kupavykh A. The effect of fluid saturation on the elastic-plastic properties of oil reservoir rocks. Curved and Layered Structures. 2020;7(1):29–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/cls-2020-0003

3. Tananykhin D., Korolev M., Stecyuk I., Grigorev M. An investigation into current sand control methodologies taking into account geomechanical, field and laboratory data analysis. Resources. 2021;10(12):125. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10120125

4. Litvinenko V. S., Vasiliev N. I., Lipenkov V. Y., Dmitriev A. N. Special aspects of ice drilling and results of 5G hole drilling at Vostok station, Antarctica. Annals of Glaciology. 2014;55(68):173–178. https://doi.org/10.3189/2014AoG68A040

5. Pavlovich A. A., Korshunov V. A., Bazhukov A. A., Melnikov N. Y. Estimation of rock mass strength in open-pit mining. Journal of Mining Institute. 2019;239:502–509. https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2019.5.502

6. Kochneva O. E., Nefedov U. V., Fedorov N. V. Establishing the correlation between reservoir properties and facies features of the Bashkir sediments of the Gagarinskoye field (Russian). Oil Industry Journal. 2019;(2):24–27. https://doi.org/10.24887/0028-2448-2019-2-24-27

7. Kazantseva T. T. The geodynamic concept of oil genesis. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Bashkortostan. 2012;17(1):5–13. (In Russ.)

8. Kamaletdinov M. A., Ismagilov R. A. On some scientific results of petroleum geological investigations. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Bashkortostan. 2011;(4):16–22. (In Russ.)

9. Kutcherov V. G. The genesis of hydrocarbons and the formation of deposits of oil and natural gas. Vesti Gazovoi Nauki. 2013;1(12): 86–91. (In Russ.)

10. Zakharova S. S. Basic concepts of the origin of oil and gas. Nauka i Tekhnika v Yakutii. 2003;(1):16–22. (In Russ.)

11. Egorov A. S., Prischepa O. M., Nefedov Y. V. et al. Deep structure, tectonics and petroleum potential of the western sector of the Russian arctic. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2021;9(3):258. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9030258

12. Prishchepa O. M., Borovikov I. S., Grokhotov E. I. Oil and gas content of the understudied part in the northwest of the Timan-Pechora oil and gas province according to the results of basin modeling. Journal of Mining Institute. 2021;247:66–81. https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2021.1.8

13. Kutcherov V., Gerasimova I. Petroleum genesis: competition of paradigms. Voprosy Filosofii. 2019;(12):106–117. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S004287440007530-8

14. Gerasimova I. A. Petroleum genesis as a problem of transdisciplinary research. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2020;57(3):125–141. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202057346

15. Dmitrievskii A. N. Polygenesis of oil and gas. Doklady Earth Sciences. 2008;419(2):373–377. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X08030033 (Orig. ver.: Dmitrievskii A. N. Polygenesis of oil and gas. Doklady Akademii Nauk. 2008;419(3):373–377. (In Russ.))

16. Ogadzhanov V. A., Kerimov A. A., Mamedova V. A. Thermobaric criteria for predicting oil and gas prospects at the former Zhdanov field. Izvestiâ vysših učebnyh zavedenij. Neft’ i gaz. 1988;(8):62–66. (In Russ.)

17. Ryzhov A. E., Zhukov V. S., Iselidze O. V., Grigoriev E. B. Influence of reservoir thermobaric conditions on the petrophysical characteristics of rock samples of the Achimov strata. Vesti Gazovoy Nauki. 2010;(1):145–156. (In Russ.)

18. Seredin V. V., Khrulev A. S. Variations of temperature in specimens of rocks and geomaterials under failure. Journal of Mining Science. 2016;54(4):683–688. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739116041081 (Orig. ver.:

19. Seredin V. V., Khrulev A. S. Variations of temperature in specimens of rocks and geomaterials under failure. Fiziko-Tekhnicheskiye Problemy Razrabotki Poleznykh Iskopayemykh. 2016;(4):63–69. (In Russ.))

20. Aleksandrova T., Nikolaeva N., Kuznetsov V. Thermodynamic and experimental substantiation of the possibility of formation and extraction of organometallic compounds as indicators of deep naphthogenesis. Energies. 2023;16(9):3862. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16093862

21. Karasev M. A., Nguyen T. T. Method for predicting the stress state of the lining of underground structures of quasi-rectangular and arched forms. Journal of Mining Institute. 2022;257:807–821. https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2022.17

22. Kochneva O. E., Nefedov U. V., Fedorov N. V. Establishing the correlation between reservoir properties and facies features of the Bashkir sediments of the Gagarinskoye field (Russian). Oil Industry Journal. 2019;(2):24–27. https://doi.org/10.24887/0028-2448-2019-2-24-27

23. Kotlov S. N., Shamshev А. A. Numerical geo-flow modeling of horizontal drainage holes. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. 2019;(6):45–55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25018/0236-1493-2019-06-0-45-55

24. Zhang P., Mishra B., Heasley K. A. Experimental investigation on the influence of high pressure and high temperature on the mechanical properties of deep reservoir rocks. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. 2015;(48):2197–2211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0718-x

25. Gladkov E. A., Erofeyev L. Ya., Karpova E. G. et al. Geomechanical change of hydrocarbon deposits during their deformational metasomatic alterations. Territorija Neftegaz. 2016;(3):132–138. (In Russ.)

26. Abdelazim R. An integrated approach for relative permeability estimation of fractured porous media: laboratory and numerical simulation studies. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology. 2020;10:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-016-0250-x

27. Adenutsi C. D., Li Z., Lai F., Hama A. E., Aggrey W. N. Pore pressure variation at constant confining stress on water–oil and silica nanofluid–oil relative permeability. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology. 2019;9:2065–2079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-018-0605-6

28. Brace W. F., Walsh J. B., Frangos W. T. Permeability of granite under high pressure. Journal of Geophysical research. 1968;73(6):2225–2236. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB073I006P02225

29. Pollard D. D. Theoretical displacements and stresses near fractures in rock: with applications to faults, joints, veins, dikes, and solution surfaces. Fracture Mechanics of Rock. 1987:277–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-066266-1.50013-2

30. Zhang X. P., Wong L. N. Y. Cracking processes in rock-like material containing a single flaw under uniaxial compression: a numerical study based on parallel bonded-particle model approach. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. 2012;(45):711–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-011-0176-z

31. Tiab Dj. Petrophysics: theory and practice of measuring reservoir rock and fluid transport properties. 2nd ed. Boston: Gulf Professional Pub.; 2004.

32. Khashper A. L., Aminev T. R., Fedorov A. I., Zhonin A. V. Research of dependence of rock permeability on its stress-strain state. Geologicheskii Vestnik. 2019;(1):133–140. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31084/2619-0087/2019-1-10

33. Tsai B. N., Bondarenko T. T., Bakhtybaev N. B. On the dilatancy of rocks during their destruction. Vestnik Satbayev University. 2008;(5):21–36. (In Russ.)

34. Belokon A. V. Modeling of tectonic and temperature history of the drilling area of the Timan-Pechora deep reference well. Vestnik Permskogo Natsional’nogo Issledovatel’skogo Politekhnicheskogo Universiteta. Geologiya. Neftegazovoye i Gornoye Delo. 2000;(3):71–76. (In Russ.)

35. Tomkina A. V. Thermobaric conditions in ultra-deep depressions of the North Caucasus. In: Markevich V. P. (ed.) Thermobaric Conditions and Geological Exploration in Ultra-Deep Depressions. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 1981. Pp. 13–26.

36. Timurziev A. I., Lastovetskii V. P. Quantitative assessment of parameters of stress- deformation state of rocks for allocation of areas of the relative extension (dilatation) and the hyperfracturing zones by results of mathematical modelling (on example of Ety-Purovsky oilfield polygon). Part 1. Glubinnaya Neft’. 2014;2(9):1499–1543. (In Russ.)

37. Eltsov I. N., Nazarov L. A., Nazarova L. A. et al. Interpretation of geophysical measurements in wells taking into account hydrodynamic and geomechanical processes in the penetration zone. Reports of the Academy of Sciences. 2012;445(6):677–677. (In Russ.)

38. Lockner D. The role of acoustic emission in the study of rock fracture. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts. 1993;30(7):883–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(93)90041-B

39. Armstrong B. H. Acoustic emission prior to rockbursts and earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 1969;59(3):1259–1279.

40. Rozanov A., Petrov D., Gladyr A., Korchak P. Acoustic emission analysis of brittle and ductile behavior of rocks at critical stresses. In: 82nd EAGE Annual Conference & Exhibition. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. 2021;2021(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202011927

41. Vermeer P. A., de Borst R. Non associated plasticity for soils, concrete and rock. Heron. 1984;29(3):51–64.