Experimental study on forced ventilation in dead-end mine working with various setbacks of the ventilation pipeline from the working face

The study of airflow patterns at the ends of dead-end mine workings is crucial for optimizing underground mining ventilation systems. Understanding these patterns forms the basis for designing and implementing effective ventilation strategies.

Previous studies have shed light on the behavior of the main vortex and the formation of stagnant zones in such environments, but these insights remain fragmented and call for a more systematic exploration to integrate them into a comprehensive theory.

This paper presents the results of a thorough field investigation into the forced ventilation behavior in a dead-end mine working with a significant cross-sectional area (29.2 m²). We evaluated the impact of varying the setback distance of the ventilation duct’s end from the working face at intervals of 10, 15, 17, 19, and 21 m. The experimental design included precise measurements of turbulent airflow velocities at 25 carefully chosen points (in a 5x5 grid) for each setback distance, covering the area from the working face to beyond the end of the ventilation duct. This included additional measurements taken 1 meter and 10 meters past the termination of the ventilation duct, moving towards the entrance of the working area.

The fieldwork was carried out in a typical dead-end stope at the Kupol gold-silver mine in the Chukotka Autonomous District, created by drilling and blasting.

The volume of fresh air delivered to the working was maintained at a consistent rate of 17.4 m³/s across all scenarios, aligning with the mine’s standard air flow rate derived from the ventilation requirement for exhaust gases emitted by internal combustion engines of Load-Haul-Dump (LHD) machinery. With the duct’s terminal cross-sectional area at 0.8 m², this resulted in an inflow velocity averaging 21.75 m/s.

Additionally, we included insights from three-dimensional numerical simulations performed in ANSYS Fluent, focusing on steady-state air movement and developed turbulence within the dead-end space. A comparative review of both empirical and modeled data shows that the ventilation jet, for all tested setback distances up to 21 m, successfully delivered air to the working face, where it then dispersed and initiated reverse flow patterns.

These experiments led to the formulation of a linear relationship between the maximum relative velocity (compared to the initial jet velocity) at a distance of 1 m from the working face and a key geometric factor of the ventilation setup. This factor is the ratio of the duct’s setback distance to a characteristic dimension of the cross-sectional area, calculated as the square root of the cross-sectional area.

1. Shvyrkov I.A. Ventilation of blind faces after burning. Occupational Safety in Industry. 1934;(5):5–12; 1934(6):4–15. (In Russ.)

2. Ksenofontova A.I., Voropaev A.F. Ventilation of blind workings. Moscow: Ugletekhizdat; 1944. 112 p. (In Russ.)

3. Voronin V.N. Fundamentals of mine aero-gasdynamics. Moscow-Leningrad: Ugletekhizdat; 1951. 492 p. (In Russ.)

4. Adjiski V., Mirakovski D., Despodov Z., Mijalkovski S. Determining optimal distance from outlet of auxiliary forcing ventilation system to development of heading in underground mines. Journal of Mining and Environment. 2019;10(4):821–832. https://doi.org/10.22044/jme.2019.8140.1683

5. Li Z., Li R., Xu Y., Xu Y. Study on the optimization and oxygen-enrichment effect of ventilation scheme in a blind heading of plateau mine. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(14):8717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148717

6. Branny M., Jaszczur M., Wodziak W., Szmyd J. Experimental and numerical analysis of air flow in a dead-end channel. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2016;745:032045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/745/3/032045

7. Kozyrev S.A., Amosov P.V. Mathematical modeling of blind working ventilation during blasting works with CFD-models used. In: Aerology and Safety of Mining Enterprises. Collection of Research Papers. 2013;(1):23–29. (In Russ.)

8. Kulik A.I., Timchenko A.N., Kosterenko V.N., Kobylkin S.S. Features of modelling aerogasodynamics of coal mine face. Ugol’. 2023;(3):75–78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18796/0041-5790-2023-3-75-78

9. Juganda A., Strebinger C., Brune J. F. Discrete modelling of a longwall coalmine gob for CFD simulation. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. 2020;(30):463–469.

10. Isaevich A., Semin M., Levin L. et al. Study on the dust content in dead-end drifts in the potash mines for various ventilation modes. Sustainability. 2022;14(5):3030. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053030

11. Liu A., Liu S., Wang G., Elsworth D. Predicting fugitive gas emissions from gob-to-face in longwall coal mines: coupled analytical and numerical modeling. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2020;150:119392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119392

12. Xin S., Wang W., Zhang N. et al. Comparative studies on control of thermal environment in development headings using force/exhaust overlap ventilation systems. Journal of Building Engineering. 2021;38:102227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102227

13. García-Díaz M., Sierra C., Miguel-González C., Pereiras B. A discussion on the effective ventilation distance in dead-end tunnels. Energies. 2019;12(17):3352. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12173352

14. Fainburg G.Z. Digitalization of the processes of ventilation of potash mines. Monograph. Perm-Ekaterinburg; 2020. 422 p. (In Russ.)

15. Mustel P. I. Mine aerology. M.: Nedra Publ.; 1970. 215 p. (In Russ.)

16. Kaledina N.O., Kobylkin S.S. On the choice of a method for ventilating dead-end mine workings in gas-rich coal mines. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2014;(12):99–104. (In Russ.)

17. Kolesov E.V., Kazakov B.P. Efficiency of ventilation of dead-end development headings after blasting operations. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering. 2020;(7):15–23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2020/7/2715

18. Kazakov B.P., Shalimov A.V., Grishin E.L. Ejecting the return air flow on increasing the range of the air jet directed into the face of the dead-end drift. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering. 2022;333(9):27–36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2022/9/3624

19. Kazakov B.P., Kolesov E.V., Nakariakov E.V., Isaevich A.G. Models and methods of aerogasdynamic calculations for ventilation networks in underground mines: Review. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. 2021;(6):5–33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25018/0236_1493_2021_6_0_5

20. Mostepanov Yu.B. Study of the range of a constrained jet acting in the face of a dead-end mine. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii. Gornyi Zhurnal. 1978;(11):47–50. (In Russ.)

21. Parra M.T., Villafruela J.M., Castro F., Mendez C. Numerical and experimental analysis of different ventilation systems in deep mines. Building and Environment. 2006;41(2):87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.01.002

22. Hasheminasab F., Bagherpour R., Aminossadati S.M. Numerical simulation of methane distribution in development zones of underground coal mines equipped with auxiliary ventilation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2019;89:68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.03.022

23. Maltsev S.V., Kazakov B.P., Isaevich A.G., Semin M.A. Air exchange dynamics in the system of large cross-section blind roadways. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. 2020;(2):46–57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25018/0236-1493-2020-2-0-46-57