Rock burst forecasting technique and selecting a safe coal face advance direction
https://doi.org/10.17073/2500-0632-2022-2-126-136
Abstract
Mine planning involves selecting an optimal mine layout. At the same time key factors, including those influencing mining safety, should be comprehensively taken into account. A developed rock burst forecasting technique taking into account mine workings of an extraction area and a mine goaf enables determining the safe direction of a coal face. The proposed technique also takes into account all faulting/joint systems, occurring beyond a mine field. The distribution of specific potential energy in an intact rock mass is proposed to be used as the basis of the input data required for rock burst forecasting. The forecast is carried out via estimating the Lode-Nadai coefficient at different directions of coal face advancing. The stress (intensity) coefficient is proposed to be used as a criterion in order to determine a safe direction. We determined the safety criterion is equal to 10 in the Komsomolskaya Mine conditions. Besides, the safest direction of a coal face advance to mitigate the risks of rock burst was determined for this mine. The direction between 138° and 128° counter-clockwise from the north direction was identified to be the safest for the Komsomolskaya Mine conditions for any values of deformation modulus and Poisson’s ratio.
About the Authors
S. S. Kobylkin
National University of Science and Technology “MISiS” (NUST MISiS)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey S. Kobylkin – Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor of the Department of Safety and Ecology of Mining, Mining Institute
Scopus ID 56209222200
Moscow
A. S. Pugach
National University of Science and Technology “MISiS” (NUST MISiS)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander S. Pugach – Senior Lecturer of the Department of Physical Processes of Mining and Geo-control, Mining Institute
Moscow
References
1. Malinnikova O., Uchaev D., Uchaev D., Malinnikov V. The study of coal tectonic disturbance using multifractal analysis of coal specimen images obtained by means of scanning electron microscopy. In: E3S Web of Conferences. 1st International Scientific Conference “Problems in Geomechanics of Highly Compressed Rock and Rock Massifs” (GHCRRM 2019). 2019;129:01017. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201912901017
2. Tianwei L., Hongwei Z., Sheng L., Jun H., Weihua S., Batugin A. S., Guoshui T. Numerical study on 4-1 coal seam of xiaoming mine in ascending mining. Scientific World Journal. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/516095
3. Lan T., Sun J., Batugin A. S., Jia W., Zhang Z. Dynamic characteristics of fault structure and its controlling impact on rock burst in mines. Shock and Vibration. 2021;2021:7954876. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7954876
4. Lan T., Zhang H., Li S., Batugina I., Batugin A. Application and development of the method of geodynamic zoning according to geodynamic hazard forecasting at coal mines in China. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. World Multidisciplinary Earth Sciences Symposium (WMESS 2018). 3–7 September 2018, Prague, Czech Republic. 2019;221(1):012088. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/221/1/012088
5. Markov G. A. Tectonic stresses and rock pressure in the Khibiny massif mines. Leningrad: Nauka Publ.; 1977. 213 p. (In Russ.)
6. Lovchikov A. V. A new concept of the mechanism of rock-tectonic bursts and other dynamic phenomena in conditions of ore deposits. Mining Science and Technology (Russia). 2020;5(1):30–38. https://doi.org/10.17073/2500-0632-2020-1-30-38
7. Yakovlev D. V., Tsirel S. V., Mulev S. N. Regularities of development and technique of rapid assessment of technogenic seismic activity at mining enterprises and in mining regions. Fiziko-Texhnicheskiye Problemy Razrabbotki Poleznykh Iskopaemykh. 2016;(2):34–47. (In Russ.) URL: https://www.sibran.ru/upload/iblock/ca1/ca15451a9d2410129c5af3babe2bafef.pdf
8. Yakovlev D. V., Isaev Yu. S., Mulev S. N. et al. “GeoInfoTransSistem (GITS) hardware-software complex in geodynamic and environmental monitoring systems. In: International Conference “Mining Geophysics”. June 22–25, 1998. St. Petersburg: VNIMI Publ.; 1998 p. (In Russ.)
9. Kovtanyuk L. V., Panchemko G. L. On compression of a heavy compresible layer of an elastoplastic or elastoviscoplastic. Medium. Mechanics of Solids. 2017;52(6):653–662. https://doi.org/10.3103/S002565441706005X
10. Kondner R. L., Zelasko J. S. A hyperbolic stress strain formulation for sands. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Pan American Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Sao Paulo, Brazil. 1963;1:289–324.
11. Duncan J. M., Chang C.-Y. Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soil. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division. 1970;96(5):1629–1653.
12. Janbu J. Soil Compressibility as determined by oedometer and triaxial tests. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering (ECSMFE). Wiesbaden, Germany. 1963;1:9–25.
13. Von Soos P. Properties of soil and rock. In: Grundbau-Taschenbuch. Part 4. Ed. 4. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn; 1990. (In German)
14. Ustinov D. V. Impact of the enclosing massif model selection over the results of subway tunnels excavation modelling. Geotechnics. 2018;10(5–6):34–50. (In Russ.)
15. Melnikova N. V., Rzhevskii V. V., Protodiakonov M. M. (eds.) Handbook (cadastre) of rock physical properties. Moscow: Nedra Publ.; 1975. 279 p. (In Russ.)
16. Trushko O. V. Geodynamic stability assessment for mine workings in deep mines. Science, Technology and Education. 2015;(2):58–62. (In Russ.)
17. Trushko О. V., Petrov D. N., Streletsky А. V. Provision of durability of mine workings. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2012;(2):51–55. (In Russ.)
18. Basov V. V. The study of geomechanical condition of unstable rocks in the vicinity of mine working junctions. Mining Science and Technology (Russia). 2019;4(1):23–30. https://doi.org/10.17073/2500-0632-2019-1-23-30
19. Kurlenya M. V., Seryakov V. M., Yeremenko A. А. Technogenic geotechnical stress fields. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ.; 2005. 264 p.
Review
For citations:
Kobylkin S.S., Pugach A.S. Rock burst forecasting technique and selecting a safe coal face advance direction. Mining Science and Technology (Russia). 2022;7(2):126-136. https://doi.org/10.17073/2500-0632-2022-2-126-136
Views:
2812
Email this article 