Value chain stress resilience and behavioral strategies of companies in Russian coal industry

Under the current conditions, the Russian coal industry is under unprecedented external pressure: it is both the imposed sanctions and the need to meet strict environmental requirements that inevitably lead to the closure of part of the enterprises, the collapse of value chains (VCs) in the coal and related industries. As a result, a complex restructuring of the industry is required. To carry it out successfully, a reliable criterion is needed to assess the prospects for the long-term development of both individual companies and VCs as a whole. From the authors’ point of view, the degree of stress resilience of VCs is the criterion needed.
The article deals with the evaluation of the long-term development prospects of the coal industry based on the established stress resilience of VCs and the related strategies of coal companies’ behavior. The authors proposed an algorithm for assessing the stress resilience of VCs in the coal industry: a description of the aspects and typology of VCs in the Russian coal industry; an assessment of their current stress resilience; a description of the survival strategy of the companies included in the VCs; an assessment of the prospects for sustaining VCs under sanctions. Subsequently, this article presents theresults of the stress resilience assessment of 169 coal companies operating in 110 different VCs between 2010 and 2021.
The authors created a typology of VCs in the coal industry, which makes it possible to identify three basic types of VCs in the domestic coal industry: two integrated – the captive market and the hierarchical market – and one non-integrated market. Analysis of companies operating from 2010 to 2021 showed that 90 out of 169 businesses (53%) operated as integrated companies (hierarchical and captive VCs), the remaining 79 were classified as market ones.
For each type we measured overall stress resilience (βrescom), indicating the VC degree of recovery from shocks; robustness (βres), the VC ability to withstand (swallow) shocks; adaptability (βrec), the VC flexibility CDS and the ability to recover quickly after a shock. The analysis conducted by the authors showed that the stress resilience of key segments of the coal industry is low and tends to decrease and will only decrease in the long run. The research also found that systemically important companies are in the most difficult situation. They belong to the hierarchical VCs, especially the energyand coal companies, which are mainly focused on foreign markets. Their cooperative survival strategy does not even maintain the current level of stress resilience. Market and relational VCs are in a more favorable position. As a result, the authors conclude that part of the coal companies will inevitably close and for the other part a profound restructuring will be necessary, while the current survival strategies of the companies will not allow to solve this problem by themselves and an active participation of the state will be necessary.

1. Petrenko I. E., Shinkin V. K. Russia’s coal industry performance for January – March, 2022. Ugol’. 2022;(6):6–16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18796/0041-5790-2022-6-6-16

2. Smorodinskaya N. V., Katukov D. D. Distributed production under the pandemic shock: Vulnerability, resilience and the new stage of globalization. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2021;(12):21–47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-12-21-47

3. Yatsenko V. A., Kryukov Y. V. Fragmentation and consolidation of production chain in the global rare earth industry. Russian Mining Industry. 2022;(1):66–74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30686/1609-9192-2022-1-66-74

4. Kondrat’ev V., Popov V., Kedrova G. Industrial policy priorities under industry 4.0. World Eсonomy and International Relations. 2022;66(3):73–80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-3-73-80

5. Sturgeon T. J. How do we define value chains and production networks? IDS Bulletin. 2001;32(3):9–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2001.mp32003002.x

6. Park A., Nayyar G., Low P. Supply chain perspectives and issues – a literature review. Geneva and Hong Kong: Fung Global Institute and World Trade Organization; 2013. 232 p. URL: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/aid4tradesupplychain13_e.pdf

7. Kaplinsky R. Spreading the gains from globalization: what can be learned from value-chain analysis? Problems of Economic Transition. 2004;47(2):74–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611991.2004.11049908

8. Porter M. Competitive advantage. How to achieve a high result and ensure its stability. Moscow: Alpina Business Books; 2008.

9. Gereffi G. The organization of buyer-driven global commodity chains: how U.S. retailers shape overseas production networks. In: Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Chapter 5. Westport, London: Praeger; 1994. Pp. 95–122.

10. Harrison T., Lee H., Neale J. The practice of supply chain management: where theory and application converge. Springer US; 2003. 357 p.

11. Gereffi G., Humphrey J., Sturgeon T. Proposal for value chain meeting. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex; 2000.

12. Thomas H. Governing Global Production Networks in the new economy. In: Wilkinson A., Barry M. (Eds.) The Future of Work and Employment. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2020. Pp. 189–203. https://www.eelgar.com/shop/gbp/the-future-of-work-and-employment9781786438249.html

13. Smorodinskaya N. V., Katukov D. D. Dispersed model of production and smart agenda of national economic strategies. Ekonomicheskaya Politika. 2017;12(6):72–101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2017-6-04

14. Gereffi G., Humphrey J., Kaplinsky R., Sturgeon T. J. Introduction: globalisation, value chains and development. IDS Bulletin. 2001;32(3):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2001.mp32003001.x

15. Avdasheva S., Budanov I., Golikova V., Yakovlev A. Modernization of Russian enterprises: the value chain perspective. The case study of tube&pipe and furniture sectors. Higher School of Economics Economic Journal. 2005;9(3):361–377. (In Russ.) URL: https://ej.hse.ru/data/2010/12/31/1208183448/09_03_04.pdf

16. Kondrat’ev V. World economy as global value chain’s network. World Eсonomy and International Relations. 2015;(3):5–17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2015-3-5-17

17. Meshkova T., Moiseichev E. Foresight applications to the analysis of global value chains. Foresight and STI Governance. 2016;(1):69–82. https://doi.org/10.17323/1995-459x.2016.1.69.82

18. Aldrighetti R., Battini D., Ivanov D., Zennaro I. Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: a review and future research directions. International Journal of Production Economics. 2021;235:108103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108103

19. Smorodinskaya N. V., Katukov D. D. Global value chains: how to enhance resilience under sudden shocks? Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law. 2020;(6):30–50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2020-13-6-2

20. Kondrat’ev V., Popov V., Kedrova G. Global value chains transformation: three industries’ cases. World Eсonomy and International Relations. 2020;64(3):68–79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-3-68-79

21. MacLeman H., Miller A. M., Marty L. Resilience systems analysis: Learning and recommendations report. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017. 88 p. URL: https://www.oecd.org/dac/conflict-fragility-resilience/docs/SwedenLearning_Recommendationsreport.pdf

22. Floris L. M., Calegario C. L., Ávila E., Caetano R. M. Determinant factors of insertion in global value chains: an analysis of the mining industry participation. International Business. 2020;15(3):80–102. https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v15i3.583

23. Pietrobelli C., Marin A., Olivari J. Innovation in mining value chains: New evidence from Latin America. Resources Policy. 2018;58:1–10. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.05.010

24. Kondratiev V. B. (ed.) Resources-based modernization model: opportunities and constraints. Moscow: IMEMO; 2020. 245 p. (In Russ.) URL: https://www.imemo.ru/files/File/ru/publ/2020/2020-005.pdf

25. Vdovin A. N. Value chains’ specifics in the enterprises of the Russian fuel and power sector. Upravleniye ekonomicheskimi sistemami. 2011;(33):1–13. (In Russ.)

26. Nikitenko S., Goosen Ye. Added as an Instrument for the Development of the Kuzbass Coal Industry. ECO. (In Russ.) 2017;(9):104–124. URL: https://ecotrends.ru/index.php/eco/article/view/1365

27. Gereffi G., Humphrey J., Sturgeon T. The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy. 2005;12(1):78–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290500049805

28. Martin R. Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks. Journal of Economic Geography. 2012;12(1):1–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbr019

29. Goosen E. V., Nikitenko S. M., Kagan E. S., Pakhomova E. O. Evolution of VAC in the context of coal industry advance in the conditions of digitization in Russia. Eurasian Mining. 2019;(2):36–40. https://doi.org/10.17580/em.2019.02.08

30. Felice G., Lamperti F., Piscitello L. The employment implications of additive manufacturing. Industry and Innovation. 2022;29(3):333–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2021.1967730

31. Iizuka M., Pietrobelli C., Vargas F. Innovation in mining global value chains: implications for emerging economies. In: Daly A., Humphreys D., Raffo J., Valacchi G. (eds.) Global Challenges for Innovation in Mining Industries. Cambridge University Press; 2022. Pp. 88–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108904209.005